This is a place for any extant garments in private collections from about 1941 back. There is no beginning date. The only rule is that it can't be currently in a museum and must be before the bombing of Pearl Harbor. I mostly post items I've seen on ebay, etsy, or other auction sites so we will continue to have a record of them for research purposes. If you have antique clothing in your collection, please, email me pictures of them and I will gladly add them to this site.
Wednesday, September 3, 2014
1880's Red Bustle Dress
From the seller:
I did research this in my large vintage fashion catalog collection to find the correct time period for it.
The fitted bodice with many metal stays and the box-pleated skirt with a small padded and two interior wire bustles plus ties indicate an early to mid 1880's period of time.
It is in excellent condition for a silk garment that is over 130 years old. I believe that due to a lack of damage, this dress was probably only worn once or maybe even not at all:
The color is deep, rich, even, and unfaded. The color can also vary from a reddish-maroon to a bright ruby red depending on the lighting.
The fabric is free of shattering, holes, or noticeable stains.
The hem is also free of the usual frayed edges, dirt, or water stains.
As you can see in the close-ups of the lining of the bodice, there aren't any perspiration stains or rust spots from the metal stays.
There is just the faintest ring in the underarms.
The bodice still has all of its original abalone buttons.
All measurements were taken while the garment was laying flat on a table:
BODICE
The bust is 15" (30") from one armpit to the other.
The waist is 12" (24").
The length of the sleeve from the armhole seam to the cuff is 21".
SKIRT
The waist is 12" (24").
The length is 40".
From Me:
What I find interesting about this dress is the skirt. The bustle being attached to the inside and the boning in the skirt itself to give that bustle shape makes me think this was some sort of costume for the theater (making it later) or perhaps a display gown of some sort.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Very interesting hypothesis, Isabella. It does seem odd that even a woman of privilege would have a built-in bustle rather than one or a few bustles that would rotate with different gowns.
ReplyDeleteI admit I was hesitant to post it because it could be a very, very well done costume but I know if I didn't, three years later there will be one just like this in a different color and I won't be able to pull the two together for documentation to prove that this built in bustle was a thing. :-)
DeleteI'm pretty sure several patterns in the Frances Grimble books call for built-in boning and padding.
DeleteLovely dress!
ReplyDeleteI've read several descriptions of skirts with the steels built in. It wasn't common, but it wasn't that rare, either. The owner could slip the steels out of the skirt for storage, and presumably for use in other skirts. Next time I run across it, I'll save the description for you. But I'm stuck in 1871 at the moment. :-)
One of the dresses i own has the built in pad, and another the hoops. I get the impression they were worn with a bustle also, and helped define the shape
ReplyDelete